From: Michal Soltys <sol...@ziu.info>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:29:10 +0200

>> On 11-07-22 11:58, Michal Pokrywka wrote:
>> 
>> commit b262a5da755cc6ed0cb4fba230cd9bf4037e1096 sch_sfq: fix peek()
>> implementation
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> commit 9df49f2bfe862573911a080c75a6d81113c5c81d sch_sfq: avoid giving
>> spurious NET_XMIT_CN signals
>> 
>> Reverting these patches makes HFSC work again.
>> 
>
> This one (upstream 8efa885406359af300d46910642b50ca82c0fe47) seems to be
> the culprit (does reverting only that one cures the problem ?)

Yes, indeed. Commit b262a5da755cc6ed0cb4fba230cd9bf4037e1096 is irrelevant.

Patch "sch_sfq: fix sfq_enqueue()" (provided by Eric Dumazet) applied to 
2.6.39.1 fixes the problem, and hfsc+sfq works as expected.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/344feff5.16ac6e1d.4e3aa4c3.49...@o2.pl

Reply via email to