Hello,

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry we dropped the ball on this.  Dan, any news (e.g., do later
> kernels do any better)?  Alexey, any ideas for tracking this down?

No worries, not like these machines are useful for much beyond museum
pieces any more ;) Sorry about the pastebin.ca though, I didn't
realize that they were gone.

As for later kernels, I have no idea tbh. Currently they seem to run
flawless with noapic, so that is what I use when installing and
running them. I do know that the Debian Squeeze installer chokes if I
don't use noapic, however.

If you are interested in some closure, I suppose I could take a shot
at installing something a little more recent and see if I can get away
with removing noapic though. Just let me know what kernel source
(vanilla/deb sid/etc), version, or any particular .config options that
you would like me to test, and I can see about pasting the console
terminal output when running without noapic disabled. I won't use a
pastebin this time, I promise ;)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cak82gmfduy5dm+fpkrjueep9w6bffgl4u0h-fp8b6bmmhah...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to