Hi Petr, Petr Tichy wrote:
> [958021.754593] afpd: page allocation failure: order:1, mode:0x20 > [958021.759018] Call Trace: > [958021.763346] [c00000000fffee10] [c0000000000134f4] .show_stack+0x80/0x130 > (unreliable) > [958021.772169] [c00000000fffeec0] [c000000000118ea0] > .warn_alloc_failed+0xf0/0x108 > [958021.781514] [c00000000fffef80] [c00000000011c170] > .__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x700/0x7c4 > [958021.791170] [c00000000ffff110] [c000000000158754] > .kmem_getpages+0x5c/0x140 > [958021.796193] [c00000000ffff1b0] [c000000000158a78] > .fallback_alloc+0x174/0x200 > [958021.805902] [c00000000ffff290] [c00000000015a474] > .kmem_cache_alloc+0x104/0x1f8 > [958021.815720] [c00000000ffff350] [c0000000003c2970] > .sk_prot_alloc+0x38/0x1c4 > [958021.820730] [c00000000ffff400] [c0000000003c3a0c] .sk_clone+0x20/0x2cc > [958021.825597] [c00000000ffff4a0] [c000000000412bcc] > .inet_csk_clone+0x1c/0x94 > [958021.830363] [c00000000ffff530] [c00000000042bb14] > .tcp_create_openreq_child+0x24/0x3e8 > [958021.839509] [c00000000ffff5e0] [c00000000042a044] > .tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock+0x3c/0x31c [...] Interesting. What was happening when this happened? (Were you using the machine? Was it idle or busy? What is the usual workload like? Had you just upgraded the kernel recently?) Is this reproducible? Thanks for writing, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120327212221.GA31143@burratino
