Josh Triplett wrote:

> Less so, but yes.  As far as I know, sbs-battery drives a superset of
> hardware, but bq20z75 does drive a useful subset (though one that
> doesn't include the hardware I actually have).  Having bq20z75 in the
> wheezy 3.2 kernel wouldn't serve the particular purpose I had in mind
> for it, but it seems potentially useful.

Do you know of relevant patches that could change that?  (I.e., maybe
this is a candidate for a driver backport.)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120608154325.GD10380@burratino

Reply via email to