Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:58:28 +0100 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#684927: linux: why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB has caused the Debian Bug report #684927, regarding linux: why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 684927: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684927 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: linux Severity: wishlist Hi. Why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB. The former seems to be better and even the help text says it's the default choice. Cheers, Chris. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Source: linux > Severity: wishlist > > Hi. > > Why not using CONFIG_SLUB instead of CONFIG_SLAB. > The former seems to be better and even the help text says it's the > default choice. RTFchangelog Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus
--- End Message ---
