On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:05 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > I think the question here is what the `uname -r` bit should be. > Specifically the $FLAVOUR in 3.x.y-z-$FLAVOUR.
Woops, I missed that uname -r includes the flavour bit. > I think there is an argument for making the multiplatform case be the > default "no-flavour flavour" i.e. $FLAVOUR is armhf/arm64 etc. Or > maybe that's what you are suggesting having not realised that `uname > -r` currently includes the -$FLAVOUR suffix. Hrm, I think we may > actually be talking about the same thing ;-) Right, my suggestion is just to use the architecture for the flavour, as is done on the other architectures. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
