On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:53 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 01:28 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'm seeing packet loss when forwarding from a LAN to PPP, whenever GRO
> > kicks in on the LAN interface.
> > 
> > On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 05:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [...]
> > > The Windows system is connected to the LAN interface (int0).  Turning
> > > off GRO on this interface works around the problem.  But since GRO is
> > > on by default, it clearly ought to work properly with iptables.
> > > 
> > > I'll try to work out where the drops are occurring, but the
> > > perf net_dropmonitor script is also broken...
> > [...]
> > 
> > I've fixed that script and now I can see that it's not iptables but
> > tbf_enqueue() that is dropping the GRO'd packets.  I do traffic-shaping
> > on the PPP link like this:
> > 
> > tc qdisc replace dev ppp0 root tbf rate 420kbit latency 50ms burst 1540
> > 
> > The local TCP will never generate an skb larger than the burst size
> > because it knows the PPP interface can't do GSO or TSO.  And the wifi
> > network doesn't seem to be fast enough for GRO to have much of an
> > effect.  But a peer on the wired network can trigger GRO and this
> > produces an skb that exceeds the burst size.
> > 
> > Is this a bug in sch_tbf, or should I accept it as a limitation?  It
> > seems like it should do GSO on entry to the queue if necessary.
> > 
> 
> This has been discussed on netdev this year.
> 
> Jiri Pirko was working on this. 
> 
> (thread :  tbf: take into account gso skbs)

I have tested the following (net-next) patch

diff --git a/net/sched/sch_tbf.c b/net/sched/sch_tbf.c
index c8388f3..a132620 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_tbf.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_tbf.c
@@ -116,14 +116,50 @@ struct tbf_sched_data {
        struct qdisc_watchdog watchdog; /* Watchdog timer */
 };
 
+
+static int tbf_segment(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch, struct Qdisc 
*child)
+{
+       struct sk_buff *segs, *nskb;
+       netdev_features_t features = netif_skb_features(skb);
+       int ret, nb;
+
+       segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, features & ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK);
+
+       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(segs))
+               return qdisc_reshape_fail(skb, sch);
+
+       nb = 0;
+       while (segs) {
+               nskb = segs->next;
+               segs->next = NULL;
+               qdisc_skb_cb(segs)->pkt_len = segs->len;
+
+               ret = qdisc_enqueue(segs, child);
+               if (ret != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
+                       if (net_xmit_drop_count(ret))
+                               sch->qstats.drops++;
+               } else {
+                       nb++;
+               }
+               segs = nskb;
+       }
+       sch->q.qlen += nb;
+       if (nb > 1)
+               qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen(sch, 1 - nb);
+       consume_skb(skb);
+       return nb > 0 ? NET_XMIT_SUCCESS : NET_XMIT_DROP;
+}
+
 static int tbf_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
 {
        struct tbf_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
        int ret;
 
-       if (qdisc_pkt_len(skb) > q->max_size)
+       if (qdisc_pkt_len(skb) > q->max_size) {
+               if (skb_is_gso(skb))
+                       return tbf_segment(skb, sch, q->qdisc);
                return qdisc_reshape_fail(skb, sch);
-
+       }
        ret = qdisc_enqueue(skb, q->qdisc);
        if (ret != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
                if (net_xmit_drop_count(ret))


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1369101790.3301.206.camel@edumazet-glaptop

Reply via email to