2013/6/12 Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> > Write to the mailing list, not just me. > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:09:05PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > The kernel once again faild to build for armel in unstable, for the same > > reasons as before (the kernel image exceeds a specific size, which makes > > the build abort). > > Already fixed in svn. I just didn't think to check whether orion5x > was also close to its limit when trimming iop32x and ixp4xx. >
Noted. I've just been wondering what's the point of pushing so many consecutive uploads with urgency=high, if they are all gonna be allowed to repeatedly fail to build on the exact same architecture, since it spoils the whole point of enforcing a quick transition to testing via a high urgency. Martin-Éric
