3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
commit 2779db8d37d4b542d9ca2575f5f178dbeaca6c86 upstream.
Commit 02725e7471b8 ('genirq: Use irq_get/put functions'),
inadvertently changed can_request_irq() to return 0 for IRQs that have
no action. This causes pcibios_lookup_irq() to select only IRQs that
already have an action with IRQF_SHARED set, or to fail if there are
none. Change can_request_irq() to return 1 for IRQs that have no
action (if the first two conditions are met).
Reported-by: Bjarni Ingi Gislason <bjarn...@rhi.hi.is>
Tested-by: Bjarni Ingi Gislason <bjarn...@rhi.hi.is> (against 3.2)
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: 709...@bugs.debian.org
Link: http://bugs.debian.org/709647
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1372383630.23847.40.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -555,9 +555,9 @@ int can_request_irq(unsigned int irq, un
return 0;
if (irq_settings_can_request(desc)) {
- if (desc->action)
- if (irqflags & desc->action->flags & IRQF_SHARED)
- canrequest =1;
+ if (!desc->action ||
+ irqflags & desc->action->flags & IRQF_SHARED)
+ canrequest = 1;
}
irq_put_desc_unlock(desc, flags);
return canrequest;
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130719052049.063069...@linuxfoundation.org
