riku.voi...@linaro.org writes:
> From: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
>
> The Debian armhf architecture uses the ARM EABI hard-float variant,
> whereas armel uses the soft-float variant. If the compiler used
> to compile the kernel uses the __ARM_PCS_VFP ABI, the compiler
> targets armhf architecture.
>
> v3 by Riku: Use gcc define instead of CONFIG_VFP
>
> Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voi...@linaro.org>
> ---
> scripts/package/builddeb | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb
> index 88dbf23..146b74f 100755
> --- a/scripts/package/builddeb
> +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb
> @@ -45,7 +45,16 @@ create_package() {
> arm64)
> debarch=arm64 ;;
> arm*)
> - debarch=arm$(grep -q CONFIG_AEABI=y $KCONFIG_CONFIG && echo el
> || true) ;;
> + if grep -q CONFIG_AEABI=y $KCONFIG_CONFIG; then
> + if $CC -dM -E - < /dev/null|grep -q __ARM_PCS_VFP; then
Actually, I guess there's nothing preventing you building a armhf kernel
with a compiler not having __ARM_PCS_VFP defined by default, but I'm not sure
we should take care of this case. One can always use KBUILD_DEBARCH=armhf.
Arnaud
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87fv8i3fiw....@lebrac.rtp-net.org
