On 18 April 2012 18:27, Christian PERRIER <[email protected]> wrote:
> They reminded me that  memory problems are probably out of scope
> because the server has indeed been changed in March during one of the
> outages it had. Only the hard disk was kept. So, maybe the problem
> lies with the hard disk....
>
> Your mail seems to confirm this, indeed.

Perhaps this is leftover corruption caused while still in the old
machine? I don't know if the disks were fscked during the transfer...
I'll see what I can do about corruption in the database.

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout <[email protected]> http://svana.org/kleptog/

_______________________________________________
Debian-l10n-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-l10n-devel

Reply via email to