Hi Justin, On 21-11-15 20:46, Justin B Rye wrote: >> This may be a good idea. I must admit that I, as a non-native speaker, >> don't have a clear feeling of the difference between remove and purge, >> except that I know the difference from the behavior of apt. I know you >> can purge hoses and volumes with gas. > > And dissidents, and one's bowels; it has overtones of energetic > (possibly overenthusiastic) cleansing.
Right.
> Oh, how about replacing "purge"/"remove" with "delete"?
>
> That is,
> [...] Then it will ask if you want to delete the database and
> revoke the standard privileges for the user of ${pkg}.
> and
> Description: Delete the database for ${pkg}?
> [...] you can choose to delete the database and
> revoke the privileges now.
>
> It should at least be clear it's not talking about a DBMS package.
/me likes delete. But maybe we can still use your earlier idea and be
more explicit about that it is the database of the package:
[..] Then it will ask if you want to delete the ${pkg} database and
revoke the standard privileges for the user of ${pkg}.
Would adding one short line to the purge/delete question help enough so
that it is worth it?
If you no longer have need of the data being stored by ${pkg}, you
should choose this option. If you want to keep this data,
or if you would rather handle this process manually, you should
refuse this option. (Of course, t|Either way, t|T)his option doesn't
change your other databases.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
