martin f [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:26:46 +0100: > > It was unset (which means a default of 2), but now I set it to 1. Seems to > > be a lot faster now, also at boot time. Thanks! > you know, strange intuition tells me the opposite, but i guess it's > a non-uniform curve and for low traffic, a lower value might actually > be better... > Of course, deeper queue dirs are meant to accelerate things. But not on low-load systems like mine. Scanning 256 directories containing less than ten files is not useful, just a waste of blocks. :-/
# Unfortunately, hashing the incoming or deferred queue can actually # slow the mail system down (mailq with an empty queue can take # several seconds) so it should be done only in case of emergency. Somehow /all/ directories are hashed in newer versions.. :-( -- *=-+-______________________ |lintux-@t-lintux-d0t-cx: _ Ugh! Nio2f says something: ______ : http://www.lintux.cx/ | / mahhnpxvzwqcd contenttype a low i \ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-+-=-+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+-=* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
