On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:52:57 -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote: > IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about > the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and > 192.168.2.x for your two subnets. Of course, you could always split > 192.168.1.x into two (or more) different subnets too. > > Mind you, the part of my CCNA class that went over this was last > spring... I can flip through the books and check when I get home > tonight, if you like.
thats news to me. why should i not use 0.x? i will look through the literature myself, but i would appreciate if you could check back and tell me why. (easy way out!!! :) secondly, how can i split 1.x into different subnets? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
