Curt Howland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I didn't say Sarge, I said Testing. He said Testing. Once Sarge is > branched off, Testing will become completely unreliable and remain so > for an unpredictable period.
That is a big exaggeration. For me testing has been quite reliable, with the odd problem every month or so, most of which are easily fixed (nothing too serious, I never had a data loss or an unbootable machine, the most serious and difficult to fix was fonts looking ugly in Mozilla). And I'm using it ever since it exists. > Unstable has the latest kernels, which I took from his note to be a > prerequisite. It also works quite well. It's "unstable" aspect merely > means that updates aught to be done carefully and manually. If it > doesn't work well for you, such is life. A much more workable approach is to use testing by default and to update to unstable or hold back those packages that have problems. J�rgen -- J�rgen Stuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.jstuber.net/ gnupg key fingerprint = 2767 CA3C 5680 58BA 9A91 23D9 BED6 9A7A AF9E 68B4 Looking for consulting and project work in Mozart/Oz, Linux kernel, USB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
