On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:57:03 +0100, "François TOURDE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Le 12387ième jour après Epoch, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait: > > > Since many questions in the debian-laptop list are user oriented > > questions, > > I thought it would be helpful to the Debian community to ensure the > > readers here are aware of the following message I just sent to the > > debian-user list. > > > > RFC: Create d-user-woody, d-user-sarge maillists, deactivate d-user > > I think that create a d-u-stable and d-u-testing is a good idea for > distrib level specific questions, but deactivating d-u is a bad > idea. How can people be aware that a question is level specific? I > think that d-u is good for general questions. > > About d-u-unstable, I'm not sure a ML is a good idea. Why not using > devel, so close to unstable? And inform non-devel user of the unstable > distrib that it is a bad idea to use unstable if they are not aware of > the BTS and other tools ? > > My 2¢. > > -- > The more control, the more that requires control.
Thanks! Great msg! :) I'll summarize responses & repost within a week. -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service
