On Monday 05 January 2004 06:10, Nicola Larosa wrote: > I would avoid using cpudynd and cpufreqd at the same time, they > would probably step on each other's toes. But surely that's not > what the OP meant. :^)
They indeed do seem to step on each other's toes - at least that's
what I've experienced.
However, I'd be interested to know why you chose cpufreqd over
cpudynd. I use cpudynd but for no particular reason. Is there
anything that makes cpufreqd actually superior?
--
--- Magnus von Koeller ---
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
address: International University
Campus 9, App. 13
D-76646 Bruchsal / Germany
phone: +49-7251-700-659
mobile: +49-179-4562940
web: http://www.vonkoeller.de
pgpxeu6ppfFPQ.pgp
Description: signature
