On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 02:02:52PM -0700, Baz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Frank Lin PIAT <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Don't post as HTML please. Also, just quote the important of the
@Baz: why do you insist to pollute the ML with HTML? can't you send plain text? mailer's limits? Also, would you pls bother - as asked - to quote 'just enough' for your replies? > > > >> Please help... > > > > Please ask question properly yep, the smarter & more documented the question, the better (the chance of a) good answer; if anybody has already one, that is. Else you need to wait, or try to figure out by yourself & contribute back to the community. > > > I take it you can't use a system that's going to fail at any given keep/revert-to the working system. Use a Live-CD to test the new one from time to time, & upgrade when you're satisfied. Anyway, there's plenty of alternatives out there to try - eg Ubuntu as you mentioned; you know that Debian's pkg aren't as updated as other distros. Perhaps checking whether distro X version y.z get it right, and reporting to the ML would be more helpful than just blaming Debian. > I was asking the guy who responded, not you or anyone in general. Learn this is a public ML: 'you' in such context usually means Debian's devs; to avoid misundertanding, pls use the usual form '@name:'. > plain English. Maybe if your much celebrated development cycle was as good > as it claims, then this wouldn't have happened. Quit trying to shift the > blame. It worked with etch, it doesn't work now. Debian devs don't have all the hw on the market avail for testing - nor they'd have the time to do the testing anyway. Also, they mostly depend on upstream. All get feedback from the userbase, which hopely helps to improve things. Sadly your way to make feedback doesn't help much. -- paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
