On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 06:48:04PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > You are too narrow-minded.
Wanting clear language is narrow-minded? I think you might have wanted a different insult, this one makes no sense. > ... It says "AMD" because it's the architecture designed by AMD. Would it > be named "intel", "ia" or "x86_64", we'd be in thesame situation because > it's not only for Intel CPUs and the last CPU namex *86 was made (not even > mentioning introduced) years ago. OK, you've listed other confusing bits of terminology. Why do these bad choices make other bad choices better? -- Carl Fink [email protected] Read my blog at blog.nitpicking.com. Reviews! Observations! Stupid mistakes you can correct! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
