Hello debian-legal regulars,
I would need to ask your consensus opinion on the non-freeness of the
Academic Free License ("AFL") v3.0.My personal conclusion is that this license includes non-free restrictions and is also problematic with respect to Debian mirror infrastructure. My own analysis [1][2] of the AFL v3.0 was sent to debian-legal on September 2012 and received no rebuttal. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00081.html [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00082.html I then proceeded to file the bug report against subversion, but it was closed [3] with the request to form consensus on debian-legal (which I think was already formed, since nobody objected to my analysis...). [3] https://bugs.debian.org/689919#51 Could you please explicitly express your agreement with my analysis? Thanks for any help you may provide. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpHcq2Gf5ZUB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
