BY without SA is fine. ND and NC are not. Its basically copyleft vs permissive. Non-SA works don't ensure derived works are also in the Commons. On Nov 1, 2015 3:22 PM, "Oleksandr Gavenko" <gaven...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-11-01, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > > CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC-BY-SA 4.0 are both DFSG free. > > > > CC-BY-SA 2.5 is not. > > > > Any CC license with -NC is nonfree. > > > I already known that info, it present on > > https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses > > My question about: > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko <gaven...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> describe current practice for CC-BY 3.0/4.0? > > CC-BY is different from CC-BY-SA: > > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ > > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ > > -- > Best regards! >
