Hi, If I was to make a tool for general purpose, to help others, and ensure freedom is guaranteed, I'd go with [A]GPL. If I want to make a commercial product, I would go and opt for a proprietary license.
Now I see a reason for people choosing other licenses, like Apache, is calling it being more permissive. Is it correct to assume "permissive" here refers to the idea of taking the code and easily changing it proprietary? Taking the code, and mixing it with other proprietary product ? -- Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me in replies for quicker response
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part