debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] Jerome BENOIT
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] Ben Finney
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ian Jackson
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
  • Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ian Jackson
• WOMEN'SDAY Ce vendredi au Mas Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
• libfcgi-perl copyright issue Graham Knop
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Paul Wise
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Paul Wise
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Ulrich Mueller
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Riley Baird
• Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ? Bas Wijnen
  • Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ? Don Armstrong
• According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Adam D. Barratt
  • Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Cord Beermann
  • Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Georgi Guninski
  • Re: According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Luca Filipozzi
• Missing changelog file Rock Storm
  • Re: Missing changelog file Ben Finney
  • Re: Re: Missing changelog file Rock Storm
  • Re: Missing changelog file Ben Finney
• Code in lwIPv6 library under advertising requirement Ben Finney
  • Re: Code in lwIPv6 library under advertising requirement Riley Baird
  • Re: Code in lwIPv6 library under advertising requirement Francesco Poli
• Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Nick Mathewson
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Walter Landry
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Paul Wise
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Paul Wise
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Walter Landry
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Paul Wise
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Jim Wright
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Francesco Poli
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Jim Wright
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Zhu-Zhu Chin
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Walter Landry
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Zhu-Zhu Chin
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Walter Landry
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Zhu-Zhu Chin
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
  • Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Jim Wright
• Ordering Apparel for Your Gym in 2016? Request a Quote. Amelia Horton
• "Personal" term in Apple license Alberto Luaces
  • Re: "Personal" term in Apple license Riley Baird
  • Re: "Personal" term in Apple license Alberto Luaces
• New Artist Community Orfium Music
• Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
  • Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Francesco Poli
  • Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
  • Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
  • Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Francesco Poli
  • Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
  • Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Francesco Poli
  • Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
• ISA-L license Ondrej Novy
  • Re: ISA-L license Ben Finney
• Pozvánka: Akadémia klasickej ekonómie 2016 Konzervatívny inštitút M . R . Štefánika
• C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Elmar Stellnberger
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org jonathon
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Elmar Stellnberger
  • Please do not compound license proliferation (was: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org) Ben Finney
  • Re: Please do not compound license proliferation (was: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org) Francesco Poli
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Elmar Stellnberger
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Andrew Shadura
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Ángel González
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Riley Baird
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Elmar Stellnberger
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Riley Baird
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org stressware2
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org stressware2
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Ángel González
  • Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Charles Plessy
• Soirée Célib' ce vendredi au Mas - Gratuit pour les femmes* + Menu du week end Le Mas - Puyricard
• Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Guilherme Brondani Torri
  • Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Walter Landry
  • Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Riley Baird
  • Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Walter Landry
  • Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? stressware2
  • Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Gunnar Wolf
• Is an AGPL2 possible? Jonathon Love
  • Re: Is an AGPL2 possible? Simon McVittie
• Non-DFSG doc package "distributed in conjunction with"? Peter Pentchev
• Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Rytis
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Rytis
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ben Finney
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ben Finney
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ian Jackson
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ben Finney
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ian Jackson
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ben Finney
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Hendrik Weimer
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Charles Plessy
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Hendrik Weimer
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Paul R. Tagliamonte
  • Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Florian Weimer
• Fwd: SPIN license -- now BSD 3-Clause! Tom Lee
  • Re: SPIN license -- now BSD 3-Clause! Paul Wise
• Creative Control. Custom Apparel. CreateMyTee Andrew Haseltine
• Votre programme du réveillon - Le Mas Le Mas - Puyricard
• Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Sebastiaan Couwenberg
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Walter Landry
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Sebastiaan Couwenberg
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Walter Landry
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Johan Van de Wauw
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Johan Van de Wauw
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ben Finney
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Scott Simmons
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ben Finney
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ben Finney
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ian Jackson
  • Discussions on legal effects of distributing software in Debian (was: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms) Ben Finney
  • OGC work, license conditions (was: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms) Ben Finney
  • Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ben Finney
• debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ángel González
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ian Jackson
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Neil McGovern
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Charles Plessy
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ian Jackson
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ian Jackson
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Pamela Chestek
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
  • Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ian Jackson
• Bug#805762: armory: Click-wrap dialogue appears on first use of package Riley Baird
  • Re: Bug#805762: armory: Click-wrap dialogue appears on first use of package Joseph Bisch
• Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
  • Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Francesco Poli
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Francesco Poli
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Osamu Aoki
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Francesco Poli
  • Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Francesco Poli
  • Non-Free SGML entity files stressware
• CISST licence and DFSG Jochen Sprickerhof
  • Re: CISST licence and DFSG Francesco Poli
  • Re: CISST licence and DFSG Riley Baird
  • Re: CISST licence and DFSG MJ Ray
  • Re: CISST licence and DFSG Ben Finney
  • Re: CISST licence and DFSG Ben Finney
  • Re: CISST licence and DFSG Ian Jackson
• licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Hideki Yamane
  • Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Mark Weyer
  • Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Florian Weimer
  • Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Ian Jackson
  • Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Ben Finney
  • Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Ian Jackson
  • Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Ben Finney
  • Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Hideki Yamane
• Happy weekend celidoli
• TPP 14.17 Glenn McGrath
  • Re: TPP 14.17 Walter Landry
  • Re: TPP 14.17 Glenn McGrath
  • Re: TPP 14.17 Steve Langasek
  • Re: TPP 14.17 Glenn McGrath
  • Re: TPP 14.17 Ben Finney
  • Re: TPP 14.17 Paul Wise
  • Re: TPP 14.17 Paul Wise
• [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Ritesh Raj Sarraf
  • Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Riley Baird
  • Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Paul Wise
  • Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Ritesh Raj Sarraf
  • Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Francesco Poli
  • The future of copyleft (was: [A]GPL vs Apache 2) Ben Finney

• Earlier messages
• Later messages