[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Kevin Forge writes: > And perhaps they have special permission from the authors. These are > private companies. We have no way to know what private arrangements they > may have made or what their internal decision making processes are.
My point was that this never came up and I was led to believe that it was legal rather than simply allowed. As an example NexT was "attacked" for making proprietary enhancements to GCC. The modified version had to be GPLed and released to keep it all legal. However the same NeXt shipped GCC linked against it's proprietary LibC and _that_ wasn't mentioned as a problem. > > Anybody remembers who ships XEMacs ? > > Just about everybody, including Debian. Why? I read somewhere that it was initially a Motif/X port/Fork of Emacs. This allegedly happened long before the Hungry programers made LessTiff ( worst OSS name if ya ask me. but it works :)
