Kevin Forge writes: > As an example NexT was "attacked" for making proprietary enhancements to > GCC.
That was a clear violation of the GPL. > However the same NeXt shipped GCC linked against it's proprietary LibC > and _that_ wasn't mentioned as a problem. Because it wasn't. That is *exactly* what the system library clause was designed for. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI
