Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scripsit Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You seem to be saying that the contract is worthless since it is > > difficult to enforce. > > No, I'm saying that the contract is unneccesary, because it won't make > any difference. In the cases where it is possible to enforce it, the > culprit will already being punished harder than the contract can > manage to do it.
I'm confused. How is that different from what I said? > > You aren't saying anything about whether the law requires Debian to > > make that contract. > > No. Does the law do that? That would be my entire point. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
