Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I the only one seeing problems in the wording of these > "permissions"? What does "not bound by the GPL"? [...] > Does it make sense? [...]
No, you're not the only one. It might mean that we don't have a valid license for those acts, or it might mean that some other (unspecified) license is offered. Yes, it makes sense, but it doesn't mean what I hope the licensor meant. The added restriction means that we don't have a useable permission anyway and so liblouis isn't free software yet. What a waste. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
