Hi Michael, I'm personally not interested in the Lex topic itself but I'm reading the list because I would like to push the Blends idea into different topics.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:20:25PM +0200, Michael Guck wrote: > Hi all, > > as we plan to invest time on the debian-lex project we would like to know, > if this debian-lex list is still read by any human, For an overview about the list activity you can have a look here: http://blends.alioth.debian.org/lex/ As an internal hint the graph is based on the data file http://blends.debian.net/liststats/authorstat_lex_year.txt (which shows more than only top 10 posters). It includes the postings including October 2011. > please replay on this message. IMHO this reply should also contain the specific interest and even better the plan you want to do inside the project - an even better proof of beeing human than filling in a captcha. :-) My personal input would be to help maintaining some Blends related technical infrastructure which is used to create the web sentinel considting (currently of the tasks pages http://blends.alioth.debian.org/lex/tasks and the bugs pages http://blends.alioth.debian.org/lex/bugs/ which are for Debian Lex not very relevant because if there are very few packages you just have close to no bugs). If you have ideas about other tasks Debian Lex should cover or other packages which might fit into the existing tasks I can give advise how to include this. Kind regards and thanks for starting this "ping the list effort" Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
