Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [checks/fields] > I've rewritten the thing (more or less) from scratch, but only had time > for a few checks (meaning "everything seems to work as it should with > two really broken packages").
I just had a few minutes to test it on my own packages, which lead to
fixes for several rather annoying false positives.
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fields
Description: Binary data
pgpsn4WvaP53L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
