Your message dated Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:25:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This is already the case
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2001 05:29:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 29 23:29:38 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from boof.brainfood.com (gradall.private.brainfood.com)
[216.234.231.190]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 169gEz-0007q7-00; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:29:37 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=adam)
by gradall.private.brainfood.com with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 169gFE-0001sd-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:29:52 -0600
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:29:50 -0600 (CST)
From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lintian should uses too many override files
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lintian
Version: 1.20.17
When testing foo.deb, lintian should ignore /usr/share/lintian/overrides/foo,
but use the one buried in the deb instead.
Otherwise, there can be odd things that happen, when the one in the deb has
been updated, but the globally installed one(from a previous install) is used.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 121816-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2004 22:25:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 31 14:25:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B8o9H-00037M-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:25:27 -0800
Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B8o9G-0005Fc-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:25:26 +0200
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 00:25:26 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This is already the case
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This is already what happens in lintian, has been fixed quite some time
ago (probably around the time override management shifted from lintian
to the package maintainers).
Closing.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
