Your message dated Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:52:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Override issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2003 12:27:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 29 07:27:09 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-213-023-143-018.arcor-ip.net (enigma.daemon.sh)
[213.23.143.18]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19AUCS-0001J0-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:27:09 -0500
Received: from shensche by enigma.daemon.sh with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19AUA1-0005bC-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:24:37 +0200
From: Sebastian Henschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lintian: wrong-name-for-upstream-changelog is too strict
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:24:37 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: lintian
Version: 1.22.8.1
Severity: minor
hi there..
i think lintian is too strict about that warning. i (will) have a
package (irda-utils), where there is no ChangeLog file, only a
ChangeLog.man. lintian complains about ChangeLog.man being the
wrong-name-for-upstream-changelog.
yes, i will ask upstream for a changelog. for now, i touch an empty one
at build time.
cheers,
sebastian
-- System Information
Debian Release: sarge
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux enigma 2.4.21-rc1 #2 Die Apr 22 15:27:35 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.13.90.0.18-1.7 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii diffstat 1.32-1 produces graph of changes introduc
ii file 3.40-1.1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii man-db 2.4.1-7 The on-line manual pager
ii perl 5.8.0-17 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 191253-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2005 20:52:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 04 13:52:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E0mhJ-0005x4-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:52:13 -0700
Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1E0mjn-0004Lq-FP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:54:47 +0200
Received: from p54a3ec38.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.236.56]
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1E0mis-0001rr-02
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:53:50 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E0mhK-0002Ym-Cw
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:52:14 +0200
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:52:14 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Override issue
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Sorry for the late reply.
In the opinion of the lintian maintainers this issue should be
dealt with by using an override.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
