On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: > Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Package: lintian > > Version: 1.23.42 > > Severity: normal > > > > I always get: > > I: dpkg-dev: unknown-field-in-control bugs > > I: dpkg-dev: unknown-field-in-control origin > > > > Since dpkg-gencontrol propagates Origin and Bugs fields to binary packages, > > lintian should accept them in binary packages. > > > > Thus you need to add them in %known_binary_fields and %known_udeb_fields > > I think. > > It's probably worth noting here that there's no specification for either > in Policy, so they really are unknown in that sense. That won't stop me > from adding them to Lintian's list, since we added Dm-Upload-Allowed and > the Vcs-* fields without being in Policy, but we really should document > them in Policy as well.
Note that Breaks suffers from the same problem. I should also say that those should also be fixed IMO: I: dpkg source: non-standard-arch-in-source-relation kfreebsd-i386 [build-depends: libselinux1-dev (>= 1.28-4) [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64]] I: dpkg source: non-standard-arch-in-source-relation kfreebsd-amd64 [build-depends: libselinux1-dev (>= 1.28-4) [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64]] kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, armel are unofficial architectures which are mentioned in many cases. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
