On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: > It sounds like, from your analysis, that the verioned dependencies also > need to be permitted for Python (namely python2.4 | python2.4-dev | > python2.5 | python2.5-dev) and if that were added, that would resolve your > issue. Does that sound right?
That's also the conclusion I come to, yes. It's going to be a pain to maintain for you though. > It also sounds like Python is enough of a special case that we really need > a separate tag just for Python build dependencies rather than listing the > entire alternative, since it's getting rather long. Cool, you sound like you have a plan! :-) -- Loïc Minier