* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-19 14:08:20 CEST]: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 05:56:26PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > It would be nice if the Sha1/Sha256 checksums could be checked instead > > of being simply ignored. > > Do you mean in .changes or in .dsc? Checks for .changes can probably > easily added, since we already do some for the files field.
That's fine with me, I usually run lintian on the .changes file indeed. If the ones in the .dsc files weren't checked at all before I don't see much of a regression with not adding a check for it, that would indeed be a feature request then (which wasn't my intention) and not a (minor) bug fix. :) > For the .dsc dpkg-source will probably fail during the unpack phase > anyway if the checksums field is broken somewhat. Hopefully it does not only check the md5sum, yes. Thanks, Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
