Jordà Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As far as I can tell, the only "problem" with the new layout are tags > with no extra information, for which no E/W/I is displayed in the > maintainer view[3] (I completely missed it until I tried the real log > file). The only way I can think to fix this is moving the E/W/I back to > the tag name, as in the v4 proposal[4], but I'm not sure if it is really > needed. Any thoughts? > > 1. http://ettin.org/tmp/ldo-mockup/v11/index.html > 2. http://ettin.org/tmp/ldo-mockup/v11/lintian.d.o.patch > 3. http://ettin.org/tmp/ldo-mockup/v11/full/unsorted.html > 4. http://ettin.org/tmp/ldo-mockup/v4/unsorted.html
Hm, yes, that's a problem. I think I slightly prefer [4] in that case, but another possible change to [3] would be to just add the E/W/I in that case without any additional text (meaning probably text of just ). It would look a little weird, but it would be consistent and allow you to use the current layout. However, [4] is in some sense more "accurate" since the severity is a property of the tag and not of the extra information. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
