On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:05:22PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Carsten Hey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > what about typos like alhpa instead of alpha? > > We'd still catch completely unknown architectures. > > Currently, lintian has three different classifications of architectures: > known architectures that are officially supported by the project, > semi-official architectures supported by dpkg but not part of the main > archive, and completely unknown ones. It issues a W: tag for the last and > an I: tag for the second. > > My proposal is to eliminate the I: tag and only have "architectures > supported by dpkg" and "completely unknown architectures." I don't think > the I: tag is ever helpful.
Sounds good and thanks for the explanation :) Carsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
