On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:22 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > E: pkg-has-symbols-control-file-but-no-actual-shared-libs > > Minor nit: dropping "-actual" will make the tag shorter and I don't think > it changes the meaning. > > > E: shlib-missing-in-symbols-control-file > > This is the only one that I'd lower to a warning to start, and it's > possible that we may want to lower it further. Both agreed. [...] > > The final tags indicate a mismatch between the shlibs and symbols > > control files. I'm tempted to say these should be errors as they're > > clearly wrong. > > > > symbols-declared-but-not-shlib > > shlib-declared-but-not-symbols > > shlib-declared-but-not-symbols may be fine by the same rationale as > mentioned above. symbols-declared-but-not-shlib is clearly an error. > > Isn't shlib-declared-but-not-symbols always going to be redundant with > shlib-missing-in-symbols-control-file? Hmmm, yes. Thanks for pointing out what should have been blindingly obvious. :-) Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
