On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 14:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > This would be a great place to do the other TODO list item and fix > experimental tag support. Then we could put this in now and mark it > experimental. The main thing that I believe currently doesn't happen and > should for that to work properly is that experimental tags should not be > displayed by default and should have to be explicitly enabled. > > Then, we can make it non-experimental after the release. > > Does that sound like a good idea?
Yeah, it sounds like an ideal candidate for an experimental tag. One thing I wasn't entirely clear on from a quick look at Tags.pm - are experimental tags intended to be declared as "Type: experimental" or as a "normal" tag with an "Experimental: yes" field? The comments describing %tags appear to suggest there might be a difference between a tag being experimental and it having a type of "experimental". Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
