Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 20:45 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > A couple of comments from a very quick read-through. > >> +Tag: debian-watch-file-specifies-wrong-upstream-version >> +Type: warning >> +Ref: uscan(1) > > References are intended to be pointers to further information about the > issue lintian is raising; I don't think referencing uscan(1) is > appropriate here - nor for -old-upstream-version - as the conditions > you're warning about aren't mentioned there.
Mentioned them to support what I said about not automagically mangling the version. > >> +Info: The watch file specifies a upstream version which matches a >> + <tt>debian/changelog</tt> entry and is very likely to be incorrect > as no >> + version mangling (unless specified via d/versionmangle) is done. > > "No version mangling is done, except possibly some using method X"? If > the parenthesised section is worth mentioning, is it working checking > for and using to help determine whether there's a problem? Don't think there are any of those, but tomorrow morning I can try to generate a list taking DEHS' data. > > Adam Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
