On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 17:36 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I was pondering when best to do the next upload and I came to the > > conclusion that there really will be no point where it is any more > > feasible than at any other point. We currently have a very fluid way of > > working that really has no definitiv mile stones as such. So I will just > > upload now unless I find some critical bug during upload testing. > > Yup, go for it. I keep coming up with more stuff I "should look at for > the next release," and really that's rather silly; hopefully no one will > be offended if stuff didn't make it into one version and makes it into the > next.
That sounds familiar. :-) Fully agreed - if things are horribly broken then we should fix them as soon as possible, but if an improvement ends up waiting a while longer than it's not the end of the world. > > Since we are in the freeze anyway, we don't need to wait for testing > > migration. So I would propose that we try to aim for uploads about every > > week (unless the particular week was very quiet), so that we have > > smaller changesets to debug when the bugs come in. > > That would be great. I won't personally have time to manage that, but I'm > happy to contribute to it, and between all the DDs involved hopefully we > can manage it. I can't do much to help there (at least yet :) but it sounds good to me as a rough target. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
