Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a cosmetic issue only. The test
> command-with-path-in-maintainer-script misparses the command it
> detected. See e.g. in phpmyadmin:
>
> command-with-path-in-maintainer-script
>
> * postrm:12 /usr/sbin/lighty
> * postinst:13 /usr/sbin/lighty
>
> While the actual command used is "/usr/sbin/lighty-enable-mod".
Thanks, fixed in Git.
> As a side note, we currently use a construct commonly advised, like this:
> if [ -x /usr/sbin/lighty-enable-mod ] ; then
> /usr/sbin/lighty-enable-mod phpmyadmin auth
> fi
> do you recommend to replace the part inside the if with
> `which lighty-enable-mod` then?
Yes. The recommended construct is:
if which lighty-enable-mod >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then
lighty-enable-mod phpmyadmin auth
fi
See also Policy 6.1.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
