Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm, would it be possible to do that inside lintian instead without > introducing too much complexity? I would prefer not to make harness > too intelligent, I would bet we would have to implement that intelligence > again at other places...
Hm, lintian could fork off a subprocess that handles stderr and adds a tag to it. But we would have to be careful about out-of-order output and we may stomp on ourselves and mangle our own output by printing out two things at the same time. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
