On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:40:15PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Jordà Polo wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:51:44PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> Btw, why would it be any useful to print them until the whole package is > >> processed? I would find printing them after every check script is run > >> better. > > > > The current lintian output is thought to be human-readable _and_ > > machine-parseable. I think it would be interesting to have some sort of > > output more focused on the former. It could be used when a packager only > > wants to check only a small number of packages, and it would be similar > > to the website in terms of how the information is structured. > > Hmm, right. Maybe output "formaters" should be able to indicate at what > point of the process they want to act/be called.
Nah, no need to expose that to the outside. As I said, adding calls to defined methods at the start and end of each package and check and defining them empty for Lintian::Output should suffice. The formatters can then override these methods if they need to. But maybe that was what you meant anway. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
