On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 15:20 +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 21:21 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I'm not opposed to adding it, but I think we should probably start with it > > marked as experimental, and I'd expect a lot of false positives. > > Agreed, definitely an info-level complaint if it gets added.
I've added an experimental tag for this. As with the Redhat patch, it excludes any library which also calls fork(); that loses us a bunch of false positives and gains us a bunch of false negatives, but that seems like the better side of the deal. I wasn't entirely sure about the Severity and Certainty, so suggestions / objections welcome. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
