Your message dated Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:12:22 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug #243976 [frontend] be more verbose above severity and
certainy of errors
has caused the Debian Bug report #243976,
regarding [frontend] be more verbose above severity and certainy of errors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
243976: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=243976
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 1.22.8.1
Severity: normal
Hey there :) Great work on lintian.
I note that in #190897, "E:" means "lintian is sure" and "W:" means
"lintian is not sure". /usr/share/doc/lintian/lintian.txt.gz (sections
2.2 and 2.3) explain quite succinctly that they actually mean "error"
and "warning".
So this particular bug is specifically to correct the documentation.
Having a seperate tag entire for "uncertain" (say, having E:, W:, and
U:) would be nice. #190897 also requests this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux willow 2.4.21-rc7-xfs-selinux-a1 #1 Sat Jun 7 16:58:44 EDT 2003
i686
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.4-0.1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii diffstat 1.32-1 produces graph of changes introduc
ii file 4.02-4 Determines file type using "magic"
ii man-db 2.4.1-9 The on-line manual pager
ii perl 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
pgpiIeh52frOv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.0~rc1
Hi,
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 14:08 -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> Having a seperate tag entire for "uncertain" (say, having E:, W:, and
> U:) would be nice. #190897 also requests this.
I believe the recent(ish) introduction of the Severity and Certainty
fields and the corresponding --display-level switch address this, so am
closing the bug.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
