Quoting Adam D. Barratt ([email protected]): > One part of the patch I wasn't entirely sure about, so haven't applied > yet, was the change to allow udebs to contain fonts when the package > name does not start with "otf-" or "ttf-". Christian, is this something > that's worth enforcing at the udeb level as well, or are udebs > containing fonts likely to legitimately have other names?
Currently there are none of such packages, TTBOMK....and I don't see
any reason for having some in the future.
In short, I think it's safe to assume that udeb containing fonts
should be named {ttf|otf}-<foo>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
