Raphael Geissert <[email protected]> writes: > Now that lenny is out even oldstable (i.e. etch) has an lsb-base > 3.0-6 > Am I right to assume that this bug should therefor be closed?
No, the problem isn't the version of lsb-base, it's that lsb-base isn't essential and hence can't be assumed to be present without a dependency. The solution is probably to make it essential, since it already is pseudo-essential, but I was holding the bug open until that actually happens. Right now, you technically have to have the dependency. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
