Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Hi. > > I noticed that some tests in the test suite currently fail and I'm > pretty sure that it has nothing to do with what I'm working on currently. > > But maybe someone else has a quick idea what is going wrong before I > invest my time finding it out? > > Running test scripts-diversions 1.0... building... testing... FAILED: > --- t/tests/scripts-diversions/tags 2009-03-15 23:59:59.000000000 +0100 > +++ debian/tests/tags.scripts-diversions 2009-03-28 16:42:09.000000000 > +0100 @@ -2,4 +2,3 @@ > E: scripts-diversions: orphaned-diversion usr/share/scripts/orphan > preinst E: scripts-diversions: package-uses-local-diversion preinst:12 > E: scripts-diversions: package-uses-local-diversion preinst:16 > -E: scripts-diversions: remove-of-unknown-diversion > usr/share/scripts/old-file postrm:12 Running test binaries-from-other-arch > 1.0... building... testing... FAILED:
No idea, but you are not alone: $ debian/rules runtests onlyrun=scripts-diversions [...] Running test scripts-diversions 1.0... building... testing... FAILED: --- t/tests/scripts-diversions/tags 2009-03-25 11:21:43.000000000 -0600 +++ debian/tests/tags.scripts-diversions 2009-03-28 11:45:03.000000000 -0600 @@ -2,4 +2,3 @@ E: scripts-diversions: orphaned-diversion usr/share/scripts/orphan preinst E: scripts-diversions: package-uses-local-diversion preinst:12 E: scripts-diversions: package-uses-local-diversion preinst:16 -E: scripts-diversions: remove-of-unknown-diversion usr/share/scripts/old-file postrm:12 make: *** [runtests] Error 1 > --- t/tests/binaries-from-other-arch/tags 2009-03-15 23:59:59.000000000 > +0100 > +++ debian/tests/tags.binaries-from-other-arch 2009-03-28 > 16:42:57.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > E: binaries-from-other-arch: binary-from-other-architecture > ./usr/bin/elfobject E: binaries-from-other-arch: statically-linked-binary > ./usr/bin/elfobject > -W: binaries-from-other-arch: apparently-truncated-elf-binary > ./usr/bin/elfobject +W: binaries-from-other-arch: > apparently-corrupted-elf-binary ./usr/bin/elfobject > W: binaries-from-other-arch: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/elfobject This one is tricky; you need squeeze's binutils for it to pass. > Running test files-windows-devel-file-in-package 1.0... building... > testing... FAILED: > --- t/tests/files-windows-devel-file-in-package/tags 2008-11-28 > 12:06:02.000000000 +0100 > +++ debian/tests/tags.files-windows-devel-file-in-package 2009-03-28 > 16:48:28.000000000 +0100 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ > +I: files-windows-devel-file-in-package source: > debian-watch-file-is-missing > W: files-windows-devel-file-in-package: windows-devel-file-in-package > usr/lib/foo/foo.vcproj > Running test scripts-ocamlrun 1.0... building... testing... FAILED: > --- t/tests/scripts-ocamlrun/tags 2008-11-28 12:06:02.000000000 +0100 > +++ debian/tests/tags.scripts-ocamlrun 2009-03-28 16:50:22.000000000 > +0100 > @@ -1 +1,2 @@ > +I: scripts-ocamlrun source: debian-watch-file-is-missing > W: scripts-ocamlrun: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/script1 > The watch files should be being created by runtests, so it is a bit odd. The only recent change there that I remember was the switch from the time-stamp and size -based files copying of rsync to the checksum-based one. $ debian/rules runtests onlyrun=files-windows-devel-file-in-package [...] Running test files-windows-devel-file-in-package 1.0... building... testing... ok. if [ "files-windows-devel-file-in-package" = "" ]; then touch runtests; fi Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
