Russ Allbery wrote: > Raphael Geissert writes: > >> Sure, now I see your point; but calling it a "package" disturbs me. I >> just tried to think about a better name but all I can think about is >> "file": "binary package file", "source package file",..., "changes >> file", "dsc file", "tdeb package file." > > Yeah, that works. > > $pkg in this case would be set to the file name of the *.changes file, I > think. Probably doesn't really matter since a changes check is unlikely > to use it. >
What about the tags infrastructure? what "package" name will it use? the source package name? even on binary-only changes files? Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
