Russ Allbery wrote: > > I could fix runtests so that: > > t/runtests t/scTAB/iTAB > > would do the right thing, I bet, which would be about as good. I'll > ponder. :)
Sounds interesting indeed :) > Moving more of the infrastructure for doing interesting > things out of debian/rules and into t/runtests is probably a good idea > anyway. That'd be great. Something that should probably be done soon is to avoid the lab setup test from being run every single time test/runtests is executed; it is useless when one only wants to run a specific test. Some other changes could include: * Run t/runtests before test/runtests * Make t/runtests run the t/scripts tests first Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
